Should Painting Entertain Example

Should Painting Entertain Example Should Painting Entertain â€" Essay Example > Entertainment and PaintingAccording to Lorand, (2000, p. 250) in contemporary analytic aesthetic, the concept of art has raised serious doubts not only regarding with its specific definitions but also in terms of whether or not the concept is definable at all. Moreover, according to the author, each proposed definition of art has been demolished, renounced and its effectiveness denied. The main function of art, according to Davies (1991, p. 220), is to provide enjoyment. Lorand (2000, p. 250) argues that “art is an intentional creation of beauty, an attempt to interpret various materials of human experience by disclosing their hidden potentials through their realization. It is in a sense, a kind of functionalism, however, it does not regard pleasure as the essential objective of art. Pleasure according to her is rather the by-product which accompanies any satisfying experience and it is not therefore a particular feature of aesthetic experience. This position not only assumes th at art has a definable nature but also it shows that the definition should serve as the key for understanding art’s role, its relation to other aspect of human experience as well as its problems of evaluation. The author also argues that pleasure cannot be the essential objective of art because if it does, it would have been quite easily achieved. Based on the article the secret of pleasing people is not as difficult as to unfold as the secret of composing a good work of art. ”“There are two principal themes which constitutes the aesthetic domain such as beauty as well as art. Based on the philosophy of Plato, these two are not only separated and independent with each other, but in some sense it is also opposing concepts. A clear association between art and beauty can be found in Plotinus “Enneades, ” however, the strong bond between them is broadly expressed by Kant, in the aesthetics of the eighteenth century. Art as defined by Kant, is the concept of beauty and seeks to differentiate not between beauty and but between natural beauty and artistic beauty” (Lorand. 2000). Entertainment and painting can be seen as two separate forks in the road. It can be seen as that a viewer may look at a painting and interpret it an intellectual manner. In a given context that entertainment simply covers amusement and as a diversion for a person’s or a viewer’s attention, a painting can fit into such description. Hume, on the other hand, considers the excitation of pleasure in refined individuals as a criterion of success in a work of art. Taking note of the phrase refined individuals, Hume must be pertaining to those educated masters of olden times, those who are served and waited upon. In a more contemporary setting, say on Andy Warhol’s era, a painting both entertains and expresses (“Andy Warhol, 1930(? )-1987”, 2002). A painting may be meant to entertain the viewers. The question of whether art should satisfy mass or elite is irrelevant because interpretation from a viewer differs from individual to individual, not from class to class.